<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jake Shields v. Robbie Lawler in May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/</link>
	<description>UFC and MMA News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fr702</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89997</link>
		<dc:creator>fr702</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89997</guid>
		<description>old, striker v grappler*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>old, striker v grappler*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fr702</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89996</link>
		<dc:creator>fr702</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89996</guid>
		<description>Sheilds v Lawler, well ok if StrikeForce wants to put this fight on rightyO&#039;, this clearly is the old striker v grappler match~up I&#039;m just rather concerned if Sheilds can take one on the chin from Lawler.. Mind you Paul Daley hits hard ya but I don&#039;t believe as hard as Robbie hits, perhaps this is a setup match for winner v winner and loser v loser (Diaz v LiL Shammy Shamm)~(Sheilds v Lawler)... Think about it.... If LiL Shammy Shamm wins and Lawler wins they get to face off for the #1 contender against Cung Le... That would mean that Diaz v Sheilds for the WW title.. If Diaz and Lawler win well here comes a rematch that people would want to see.. Then perhaps the LiL Shammy Shamm v Jake wouldn&#039;t be that bad of a match anyways... There are alot of ways to look at this I just wonder if these two fights (4 fighters) are being set up for title shots in kinda a 170lbs~185lbs type tourney, hey food for  thought ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheilds v Lawler, well ok if StrikeForce wants to put this fight on rightyO&#8217;, this clearly is the old striker v grappler match~up I&#8217;m just rather concerned if Sheilds can take one on the chin from Lawler.. Mind you Paul Daley hits hard ya but I don&#8217;t believe as hard as Robbie hits, perhaps this is a setup match for winner v winner and loser v loser (Diaz v LiL Shammy Shamm)~(Sheilds v Lawler)&#8230; Think about it&#8230;. If LiL Shammy Shamm wins and Lawler wins they get to face off for the #1 contender against Cung Le&#8230; That would mean that Diaz v Sheilds for the WW title.. If Diaz and Lawler win well here comes a rematch that people would want to see.. Then perhaps the LiL Shammy Shamm v Jake wouldn&#8217;t be that bad of a match anyways&#8230; There are alot of ways to look at this I just wonder if these two fights (4 fighters) are being set up for title shots in kinda a 170lbs~185lbs type tourney, hey food for  thought <img src='http://mmafrenzy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninjadanny</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89958</link>
		<dc:creator>ninjadanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89958</guid>
		<description>This is going to be a very interesting fight. However, I do see Lawler taking this one. If he can avoid the early take down he will probably get the stoppage in the third round. Either way, I am looking forward to seeing this fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a very interesting fight. However, I do see Lawler taking this one. If he can avoid the early take down he will probably get the stoppage in the third round. Either way, I am looking forward to seeing this fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvelknight4</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89944</link>
		<dc:creator>marvelknight4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89944</guid>
		<description>I also like both fighters. Lawler can problably ko Shields if the fight stays standing and if he can avoid being taken down. Shields can obviously get a submission victory if he&#039;s able to take the fight to the ground. This is a great fight with to of the top guys IMO in the sport. I wish they would get out of their contracts and get signed by the UFC where they belong. Lawler by tko or ko in the 3rd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like both fighters. Lawler can problably ko Shields if the fight stays standing and if he can avoid being taken down. Shields can obviously get a submission victory if he&#8217;s able to take the fight to the ground. This is a great fight with to of the top guys IMO in the sport. I wish they would get out of their contracts and get signed by the UFC where they belong. Lawler by tko or ko in the 3rd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Figs</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89942</link>
		<dc:creator>Figs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89942</guid>
		<description>This should be a good fight.  I don&#039;t think this will go to a decision as their styles clash too much.  I give it Lawler on the feet and Shields on the ground.  Obvious prediction though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a good fight.  I don&#8217;t think this will go to a decision as their styles clash too much.  I give it Lawler on the feet and Shields on the ground.  Obvious prediction though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timcat</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89933</link>
		<dc:creator>timcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89933</guid>
		<description>Shields&#039; Chin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shields&#8217; Chin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timcat</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89932</link>
		<dc:creator>timcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89932</guid>
		<description>That is a fantastic matchup. The only problem I have is I don&#039;t know who to root for. I really like both fighters and hope neither gets a loss. One thing is certain, Lawler will test Shiels&#039; chin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a fantastic matchup. The only problem I have is I don&#8217;t know who to root for. I really like both fighters and hope neither gets a loss. One thing is certain, Lawler will test Shiels&#8217; chin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisl</title>
		<link>http://mmafrenzy.com/9633/jake-shields-v-robbie-lawler-in-may/#comment-89931</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmafrenzy.com/?p=9633#comment-89931</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s interesting...not a great match-up for shields though. welcome back right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s interesting&#8230;not a great match-up for shields though. welcome back right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
