Monday afternoon the Nevada State Athletic Commission suspended UFC welterweight contender Nick Diaz for a year and fined him thirty percent of UFC 143 purse due to a fail drug test. NSAC’s ruling angered the California native’s fan base as well as Diaz and his team. While many are looking to blame NSAC for being too hard on Diaz, MMAFrenzy examines where the blame ultimately should fall in the situation.
Brinkmanship is defined by Merriam-Webster as “the art or practice of pushing a dangerous situation or confrontation to the limit of safety especially to force a desired outcome.” It has become a rather painful part of everyday politics in our nation’s government and a practice long-used as a deterrent in foreign policy in the Nuclear Age.
Typically, in brinksmanship, both sides come to the edge of disaster before last-minute concessions are made and disaster is averted. Nick Diaz’s legal team employed this tactic against the Nevada State Athletic Commission and yesterday it ended in disaster for Diaz as he was suspended and fined by the commission. So why did this practice end in Diaz being sidelined for a year? Well it is quite simple, they took it too far.
This failed test should have been a simple matter of a commission hearing and, what has become the sadly typical, slap on the wrist punishment where the commission reduces the suspension and fine. Instead, Diaz’s legal team made multiple counterstrikes against the commission that actually resulted in an additional penalty (providing false information on his medical questionnaire) being added to original failed test. The largest shot fired across the bow of the commission being Diaz’s camp filing suit against NSAC and challenging their ability to regulate the sport entirely.
It is this move that crossed the line and prevented Diaz from having any shot of receiving favorable treatment from the commission as it drew the ire of the State’s highest legal authority, the attorney general. By filing a lawsuit, brinksmanship ended and war was declared since brinksmanship is based on the threat of doing something rather than actually doing it.
This gross overreaction by Diaz’s attorney was further compounded by what was an already long shot defense. Diaz’s camp was trying to exploit the difference between what substances are banned explicitly and the metabolites Diaz tested positive for. The problem with this argument is not whether Diaz was high in his fight, which he was not, but that overturning a drug test on the basis of metabolites not being explicitly named would set a bad precedent for all urinalysis results. I say this since metabolites are formed from the body’s usage (or metabolizing) of a drug and those byproducts are what is excreted in urine. To dismiss a test on the grounds of metabolites not equating with their source would theoretically open the door to all drug tests (as one commissioner mentioned), including steroids, being challenged. This is territory the commission would never consider visiting in an open hearing.
There was also another huge flaw in the defense of Diaz and that is Nick Diaz. Diaz is not some scheming politician using technicalities to skirt the law to gain an unfair advantage, he simply loves pot and he enjoys fighting for money. That is Nick Diaz, and this was on full display during the hearing during a line of questioning brought on by Diaz’s legal team’s assertion that Diaz requires marijuana for a “serious medical condition.”
Diaz’s lawyer argued that Diaz’s use of marijuana was not only legal and consistent with WADA regulations (which the Commission reminded him that WADA does not apply in Nevada) on marijuana use but necessary. This argument fell apart for two reasons, one being that Diaz himself was extremely candid about using marijuana well before being given a recommendation and two, Diaz’s perceived attempts to hide his usage on both the pre-fight questionnaire and possible tampering allegations from NSAC executive director Keith Kizer.
Ultimately, the legal defense of Nick Diaz has gone far past what should be a simple issue. To not only make this a public spectacle but to potentially undermine the legal authority of the State’s MMA regulatory body over something as benign as a pothead failing a drug test is absurd. Do massive changes need to occur in the handling of drug issues by Athletic Commissions? Definitely, but to make try and make a martyr of Diaz when he did violate the rules (even if you disagree with the test results, they did prove the other violation that Diaz did not properly fill out his forms) and did not take advantage of alternative path that Chael Sonnen already proved easy to acquire literally minutes before Diaz’s hearing is asinine. As Commissioner Pat Lundvall alluded to, had Diaz simply applied for a Therapeutic Use Exemption, this issue could have been avoided.
In the end, the blame for the test results rests solely on Diaz and his management team for not taking advantage of a TUE and the blame for Diaz’s punishment rests on his legal team. NSAC has already proven they are willing to knock down suspensions and fines of fighters who test positive simply because known fighters supposedly provide an economic boost for the cash-strapped commissions. So why the all out legal assault? That all falls on the people Diaz entrusts to handle his business so he can spend more time training and smoking. Even now Diaz’s attorney, Ross Goodman, is apparently considering yet another lawsuit in regards to NSAC’s hearing today, a move that is unlikely to expedite Diaz’s return to MMA.
Personally, I do not care if Diaz smokes pot 24/7/365 as long as he abides by the same rules all fighters have to. Everyone has to do things in life they do not particularly enjoy doing but are obligated to do for the purposes of securing a living and Diaz is no different. To think otherwise because some people are willing to pay money to watch you fight is childish. Until Diaz learns to accept responsibility for a genuine mistake he made, rather than trying to blame an authority he believes is treating him unfairly, do not expect to see Diaz entertaining in the octagon anytime soon.




Yeah….Testosterone is ok but weed is bad.
Zuffa WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!!
Did you not pay attention to the article in the least? This was the athletic commission solely and has absolutely nothing to do with Zuffa. Pay attention before you spew diarrhea out of your mouth.
well written.. i totally agree for the most part, but I blame ND more than his legal team. I love beer, but I don’t drink on the job and if I had to take a pee test I would figure out how to make sure it was clean..
He tried. By twice diluting his urine.
I guess he could have gone the horse urine route….
The thing i dont get is doesnt the commission look at their peepee’s which they take a piss? How could Diaz Dilute it?
@Brent not always, especially with as long as Diaz apparently was taking after both 137 and 145. A lot of things are going on at the completion of a fight commission-wise and when one of the fighters is refusing to take a drug test it causes a lot of issues.
Bahaha very refreshing…and funny article. I only wish all the Diaz apologists could be hear to have this cold dose of reality spoon fed to them. I mean what were they thinking?? Was Diaz’ lawyer also a pothead or what? They really think they’re gonna take down the largest sports commission with some weed smoker with a bad attitude and inability to grasp basic real life situations and tact, let alone stop lying and digging himself deeper? Did they.really think there was a chance in hell they would the biggest precedent ever in the drug testing world using the stockton bad boy weed extraordinaire as their centerpiece?? All the state vs Larry flynt styles lol.
Man I’m sorry, but that was just a comedy of errors and oddball behavior attempting to recreate reality in only a way that a pothead could try. So nice to hear something other than the bent pothead rant about weed legalization, which never would even apply in these situations.
With all that said, I don’t see how they hurt themselves too much. Diaz already got suspended once, and I can’t remember if he lost some of his purse but I think so. Anyway, the last suspension was for like almost a year, so I couldnt see how he was gonna get any less than that regardless. Also with reem he did fail the test, but it was the weird T to E ratio thing, and he also at least had a doctor fly in to claim that he gave him a B12 shot that had it in it or whatever. Also, maybe he’s never been suspended by them for this exact thing before? Either way, more of Diaz not being able to get out of his own way to save his life. Too bad really. He needs to surround himself with some better people rather than the yes man tools he’s apparently kept till now. At least Nate has some intelligence. As shown in the YouTube video where the Diaz are biking with their buddies and blatantly smoking out on video, so nick can get blazed…err handle his adhd severe health condition and when nick goes to hand it to Nate, Nate has the brains to pass on it.
Heh. Anyone who is willing to claim that ADHD is a “serious medical condition” needs to have his medical license revoked.
If i had a child with ADHD i would rather them be prescibed weed then the synthetic methamphetamines that is usually prescribe.
Wasted talent…
Nick Diaz just wrecked his own career. He has no one to blame but himself…hope that was the best Mary Jane you ever had.
As mentioned above, rules is rules. Ah Diaz: I was gonna fight for the belt until I got high. Got busted by the NSAC and then I got high. Had my legal team use a risky procedure to get me off and it failed and I know why cause I got high, cause I got high, cause I got high.
Couldnt we blame the commission for having a dumb a$$ rule of banning THC? Shouldnt they have to prove the risks or rewards one takes/gets from taking this substance. Just because its a rule that doesnt justify the rule being just in the first place. I mean i know this country is behind when i come to the failed polcies of drug prohibition but we should still be confronting those issues.
Marijuana in competition is banned by WADA too, since you decided to go that route. The issue was: What is “in competition”? Clearly it doesn’t mean sparking up between rounds. The NSAC asks about 2 weeks prior to the fight. Lying about smoking your medically prescribed marijuana in that time frame is a wrong, regardless of where you are or national drug policies.
Diaz knows the rules, he just doesn’t care. F him.
The point is that they can’t tell when he smoked with the urine test, so they cannot rightfully declare that he used it “in competition.”
So the commission isn’t abiding by WADA rules, they are just interpreting the rules for their convenience.
Regardless of who is right or wrong, the punishment does not fit the crime here. 30% and a year is ridiculous. It is obviously personal because Diaz challenged them. How could Overeem get 9 months and Diaz 1 year? It’s also cool that Sonnen can cheat without repercussion, because he filled out some BS application.
Let’s be honest here, the commission doesn’t have to abide by any rules, they can do whatever the hell they want.
Actually, his penalty is what people usually get on a second offense. Also, they knew how long ago Diaz used because of his own public admission.
I don’t see how 8 days prior could be considered in competition, it just makes zero sense. But again, the commission can do whatever they want, because they make the rules, and nobody is governing them to ensure fair play. If you challenge them in court, then you’re screwed later at their own hearing where they have all the power.
You won’t convince me that his punishment is fair, even bringing up the fact that it is his second offense. Second offense for marijuana is nowhere near close to as serious as Overeem’s situation. His whole situation is way sketchier, even prior to testing positive.
Then you look at Sonnen, who admitted he was taking testosterone before applying for the exemption, and not disclosing it on his applications. This was perfectly fine, yet they went on and on about Diaz not disclosing his marijuana use on his application.
@justsomeguy – It is “in competition” because he has begun the process of being a licensed MMA fighter for a set-date fight. If he doesn’t want to be licensed for a fight in Nevada, he doesn’t need to follow their rules. If he does want, then he has to. Pretty simple, really.
I suppose, if one were sufficiently literal, they could make the argument that the rule, as written, only applies to smoking marijuana while actively involved in the cage. There’s one problem with that: that allows steroid use when not “in competition” under the same rule. Kind of a catch-22, isn’t it?
I understand what you are saying, it is a bit of a catch 22, if taken literally. I guess what disappoints me is that the commission appears to have a preset agenda dependent on the person appearing before them, and they are basically free to interpret the rules as they see fit. It really doesn’t seem like fighter safety or fair competition is what drives their decisions.
From watching the proceedings live, it didn’t feel any different from how these things normally go save for the commission not relenting at the end because Diaz “could provide economic benefit.”
The two things that stood out to me (and apparently stood out to the commission as they mentioned it as well in closing arguments) was #1 Diaz admitted to lying to the commission in his first hearing and #2 how they didn’t know what was true and what was not true about what his lawyer and he stated because even their legal filings had different variations of events and inaccuracies. Plus the public statements made by Diaz and his camp were different to start out with.
The commissions look at all of that, plus, it did not help that the UFC was not behind Diaz on the issue.
The UFC certainly wasn’t behind Overeem with, but he walked away less scathed.
Sonnen basically admitted to lying also, with regards to not disclosing his therapy earlier on earlier forms, and signing on the dotted line which indicates he’s disclosed everything required. Check out Ben Fowlkes article on MMAFighting on the Diaz/Sonnen hearings. Jamie Penick’s article on MMATorch also discusses the disparities between cases.
I listened to a good chunk of the Diaz hearing, but none of the Sonnen hearing, so I am only going by what I’ve read on Sonnen.
9 month suspension (which is essentially a 12 month suspension) and the loss of his full 146 purse totaling over a million dollars (not including his sponsors, many of which only pay after a fight) is not “less scathed” compared to $60K and a year. Overeem lost out more due to it being pre-fight. The commission specifically stated that’s why they did 9 months from the test date and not a full year.
Here’s the difference with Sonnen, even though he admitted to getting by before that, he never failed a test before 117 in California. The rules kick in when you test above the limit under the current system, though they just showed that in the Lamont Peterson case that that stance is changing too. Remember Diaz they didn’t go after Diaz for all the events he didn’t fail a test on prior to this one even though he admits to smoking. It’s when you fail a test that the hammer comes down.
It didn’t help that Diaz kept making comments and then looking at his lawyer and changing his words around most of the hearing. Whereas Sonnen was well-prepared, he may be lying, but he’s good enough it isn’t obvious.
But you’re talking about money for a fight that didn’t happen yet. By that same token, you could say that Diaz lost more than 60k, because he typically fights a few time per year.
Point taken on getting caught. I still feel the commission is playing favorites. In the end, Diaz should have been much more careful. I still don’t feel the punishment is just though, and not having him fight is a loss for fans.
I am talking about a fight that didn’t happen yet, but it was a fight that was signed. Diaz had a 0 fights signed and that matters in the eyes of the law, it is why if an officially unemployed 18 year old gets injured in an accident they will receive less in a settlement than one that was officially employed because a settlement is not based on theoretical earnings but set earnings.
Don’t forget Diaz had also publicly declared retirement from MMA. It wasn’t until the lawsuit that Diaz even gave a statement saying he’d fight again. Both his brother and coach stated Diaz was not planning to fight anytime soon, but the lawsuit alleged Diaz would have a contract to fight Condit as soon as he was cleared to fight again. Something the UFC has backed away from completely.
Also, a year and fine is the standard penalty. It’s up to the fighter and lawyer to prove why it should be lowered, they didn’t seek that, they sought to force the commission to completely forfeit any authority they had over MMA AND tried to blame the commission for their testing protocols that have been upheld by courts for over 30 years.
Sonnen kissed a$$… Overeem kissed a$$… Diaz metaphorically stuck his middle finger in their face, threatened them, and said they had no legal authority over him… and they did. So of course they were going to be harder on him.
Also being caught deceiving the commission is a much bigger crime in their eys, Thiago Silva found that out. The deception is always punished worse than the failed test.
Exactly. Don’t sue the folks who own your workplace and expect a raise or bonus.
You’re not going to get the rule changed in a commission hearing after a failed test… and even if the that rule is in place, he could have still gained an exemption prior to the fight. He had options, he just ignored them. Plus, marijuana is a federally banned drug so that’s the only justification needed for the drug being banned.
eeeesh this is what all the bitching was about no shit it was fair. 1. you know you are going to be tested 2. you have failed a drug test before 3.there is a possibility they will let you smoke (if it really is medicinal) if you turn the freaking paperwork into them and you DIDN’T! so everyone stop defending him and saying its just pot, yeah it is but he still screwed up secound offense a year suspension and only 30% of the over 100 grand he was payed to fight that night oh boo hoo they went easy on him.
Other than that you’re totally right. Lol. Na but sorry man, I think nick is just lucky it wasn’t even worse. The fact that it wasn’t a harsher punishment actually shows me they weren’t specifically after Diaz.
America is a funny place and.forging place…a good old sorry and even simply “admitting a mistake” without even naming it goes a long way. He chose to roll the dice and got the hammer. Lawyers usually explain this to their clients before trials. Obviously the other failed test didn’t help either. I feel like if anything they gave him a chance to take some responsibility and he didn’t, so he lies in the bed he made. We def miss out as fans but I can only blame the guy who smoked weed (again) before the biggest fight of his life, knowing how much he had riding on it and.knowing how much his many fans support him. Had he won he would’ve been stripped anyway. If someone wants to be mad, I say be mad at him.