Comments on: Questionable Decision Overshadows Title Bout, Dominating Performances

By: KingCreep

KingCreep — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:46:39 +0000

Look, it’s not up to Dana, Joe or Tito to judge or speak up for anyone, Bisping knows that he won a ’split decision’ which isnt very concrete as a win so he will try to at least redeem himself no matter where the fight takes place but at the same time I hope they give him more than a challenge in his next bout (if it isn’t Hamill). Everyone knows that if you leave the fight in the judge’s hands, it’s bound to be a different decision than we would have made, they’re the reputatable ones who have to face the press and the boss who decides whether or not they judge another fight. I personally don’t think either of they did enough to really ‘win’ the fight but a rematch would make sense but I could see that bout being Bisping’s last one at 205, it would make much more sense for him to be fighting at 185.

As for the professional judges we have commenting on here who play the blame game on Dana and Joe and expect Tito of all people to speak up, grow up and realize decisions are in three sets of hands and neither are ours, Dana’s or Joe’s. Any fight that goes to decision could be judged differently by hundreds of people so it doesn’t make sense to be offended or angry because of some decisions and trash talking, it’s happened since day 1 and won’t stop because some bloggers boycot a few UFC PPV’s.

By: matt

matt — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:46:05 +0000

disgusting…. bisping you are cocky guy who is just an avg fighter…. you will not hang with the elite… you lost… You should of been humble afterwards and acknowledge it was a tight fight and your glad you got the victory instead of talking trash…

By: matt

matt — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:43:32 +0000

who has bisping beaten…. mark my words two years from now he is bouncing at a night club in london…. he will drop to 185 because he realized that those guys are two big for him to handle…. I would of given him a pass if he wasn't such an ass after the fight.. He just should of said it was tough fight I used my boxing skills to get the victory, but instead he starts talking trash…. i was indifferent to bisping, I now would not watch that loser fight

By: rob fraser

rob fraser — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:07:09 +0000

disgusting decision. what a turn-off. i will definitely not buy the next pay per view. the ufc and their b**** announcers have no credibility. the rematch should be on free tv.

By: Jerry

Jerry — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:03:08 +0000

I agree with all of you. I will not watch another Bisbing fight. I don’t want to see him ket KO’ed hurt, My way of dealing with this kind of Sh*T is to never watch him again. If you watch the UFC is happy. If you don’t watch. The UFC will change its ways to get you to watch. I will watch Hamill anytime but not if its with Bisbing. The UFC wants our $$$ if they don’t get them they are smart enough to change. They get the numbers of how many watched in the US. if the numbers drop. They know and get scared. Well Thats my way

By: garth

garth — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:05:36 +0000

Kris: I still think Bisping will be dominated by any talented fighter, especially one that has good takedowns. He was petrified of Hamill’s takedowns to the point that he ran like hell the entire time.
Ah well. I put up one more angry post and now I’m done with this fight. I gotta gargle about a gallon of bleach to get the bad taste out of my mouth. The judge going online and begging people to believe his weak justifications really put the nail in the coffin for me.

By: Kris

Kris — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:01:24 +0000

Right on Garth. I doubt the UFC and Bisping will risk another fight with Hamill (even though Dana said he’s setting up a rematch). Bisping is more well suited for 185 so that decision only makes sense give how weak the division is right now.

By: garth

garth — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:59:04 +0000

too bad Bisping seems likely to run for 185lbs now. If Hamill, who’s rather inexperienced at the game, could work him over so badly, imagine what he’d do against anyone other than the inexperienced or lower-tier 205lbers. Imagine Bisping vs. Tito. Tito would hurt him horribly.

You know what I want to see? Count Douchebag against Anderson Silva. It makes me smile to think of it…Silva might actually make his head into some kind of nutritious paste, and craft a sandwich in the ring. Maybe with watercress.

By: a sick fan

a sick fan — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:54:48 +0000

I agree whole-heartedly with most everyone. It’s comforting (in a sad way) to know I’m not the only one outraged and BLOWN AWAY by the Hammill/egomaniac decision! Hammill gave a great performance; he was a true professional and a REAL MAN (he took that stupid decision ‘on the chin’) and in stark contrast, bis’pig’ was unparalleled in his uncalled-for behavior and comments after the fight. What a JERK! ‘Count’ on that!
The UFC MUST know that their credibility was flushed down the toilet Saturday night. Do they really give their fans so little credit? I guess it’s true: Everyone has their price. Shame on the UFC for making that cliche’ so poignant!
Like many, I’ve been an avid UFC fan for years and will now, unfortunately, rethink that. It’s heart-breaking and gut-wrenching to think that all sports are tainted and we can no longer truly enjoy a show of entertainment through athleticism without wondering . . . .

By: jpdocdave

jpdocdave — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:57:11 +0000

i’ve been a fan of ufc for quite a while, and i’m glad i’m not the only one outraged at this decision. hamill was in control of all three rounds, and i remember from my wrestling days that a take down is 2 points, and escape is 1 point. not that ufc is the same, but hamill controlled the fight and came out on top all three rounds. 30-27 is the only good score.