Comments on: Matt Serra vs. Frank Trigg Possible for UFC 109 in February

By: GarRule

GarRule — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:35:43 +0000

Why is everyone saying this is a “loser-go-home”????

Serra has lost two in a row, but they were to GSP and Hughes! And I STILL say he beat HUGHES!! I’ll say it again…he beat Matt Hughes.

Anyway…Trigg should stay just because he’s Twinkle Toes. No ammount of losses can take that away from him.

By: The Zan Man

The Zan Man — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:41:04 +0000

I’m going for Serra on this one

Serra’s got the ko power and good bjj

I think that Serra should fight at LW too

By: Justin

Justin — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:22:38 +0000

Trigg has fought more, recently than Serra has.

By: Justin

Justin — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:19:07 +0000

The problem is, Serra got up to around 200 while he was out with his back injury.

By: love4thedead

love4thedead — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:47:22 +0000

This is a good match up I like it and it has one implication I’m suprised none of have touched on. Now this a if a very big if. If Triggs wins I believe it sets up Hughes Triggs 3 which would be highly marketable for the UFC.

By: windmiller

windmiller — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:16:18 +0000

Serra, high kick!

By: windmiller

windmiller — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:56:48 +0000

he is holding on to that he “knocked out gsp” at 170, he is gunna get th belt? imo

and little man sindrome? imo

By: RJA

RJA — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:56:47 +0000

Oh,and trigg by spinning back fist.

By: RJA

RJA — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:55:22 +0000

Whats the point?Yea it might be marketable as jochl stated above(fight for your job prospect)but either way neither guy has much of a future at ww,as far as being a serious threat.But on the same token there both big names with some marketability.So if it creates conversation why not.

By: shogun

shogun — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:45:58 +0000

serra for this one. trigg is rusty